The Interview
Let’s start at the beginning. Where did you grow up, and what kind of environment did you grow up in home, school, the city around you?
In our small town, many families value education highly. Still, the infrastructure simply isn’t there, so many students including me moved to bigger cities like Pune, Sambhaji Nagar, Nagpur, and Mumbai to pursue better opportunities. Leaving behind home wasn’t easy. I loved my family, my roots, and the comfort of familiar surroundings.But I knew that if I stayed, I would never fully realise my potential or my parents’ dreams for me.
Stepping out of my comfort zone was a risk. It meant loneliness, sacrifice, and uncertainty. But I embraced it because I believe that true growth happens when you challenge yourself. Today, I am driven by that conviction ,I moved forward not just for myself, but to honor the faith my parents placed in me. And I’m determined to make that sacrifice count.
When you look back at your childhood, are there any moments that, in hindsight, feel like early clues that you’d end up studying law?
Looking back, another significant clue was my habit of never speaking without being fully prepared. Even as a child, I made sure I had facts, information, and context before expressing any opinion. I developed a strong interest in general knowledge, geopolitics, Indian politics, and current affairs, which helped me understand issues deeply rather than superficially. This curiosity and commitment to informed thinking gradually evolved into the analytical mindset needed for the study of law. In hindsight, the combination of confident expression and informed reasoning were early signs that I was always meant to move toward the legal profession.
Were there any lawyers, judges, teachers, or even TV shows or books that first sparked your curiosity about law and justice?
Another important figure who shaped my interest was Justice Harilal Kania, the first Chief Justice of India. His integrity, discipline, and foundational role in shaping India’s judiciary showed me the dignity and responsibility that come with the legal profession. Among books, Fali S. Nariman’s Beyond the Courtroom: Reflections on Law, Constitution, and Nationhood also played a significant role in expanding my understanding of constitutional values and the purpose of legal practice. These personalities and writings not only sparked my curiosity about law but continue to guide and inspire me in my journey toward the profession.
You studied B.A. before law. What drew you to that path, and how did your undergraduate years shape the way you think about society, power and rights?
Political Science, in particular, changed my entire mindset.
Studying Western thinkers like Plato, Aristotle, Locke and Rousseau, and Indian thinkers like Ambedkar, Gandhi and Vivekananda helped me understand how ideas evolve into political systems, democracies, constitutions and human-rights frameworks. Their philosophies taught me that:
• society is not made by one person ,it is created and sustained collectively
• power is not domination; real power is service, sacrifice and leadership for the welfare
of people
• rights are inherent from birth, and it is the responsibility of both individuals and society to respect and protect them
Through these subjects, I realised that law is not just a set of rules it is a living system that protects people, balances power and ensures justice. My undergraduate years helped me understand the deeper social, political and moral contexts behind laws.
This is what ultimately drew me towards studying law: a desire to connect philosophical ideas with real-world justice and to contribute meaningfully to a society where every individual’s rights and dignity are valued.
If someone had met you at age 16 and asked, “What will you be doing at 25?”, would you have said “law” or was this a later decision?
Even as a teenager, I was fascinated by the profession. The thought of becoming a first-generation lawyer inspired me, especially because no one in my family or even in my village belonged to the legal field. I felt that by studying law, I could serve nyaydevta (न्यायदेवता) and use my voice for people from backward regions like mine people who often do not get the opportunity to be heard.
So yes, law was definitely in my thoughts at 16, but I made the final decision later, when I realised that this field truly matched my personality, my values, my work ethic and my desire to contribute meaningfully to society. It felt like the path where my hard work could actually bring justice and make a real difference.
Law is a competitive choice, especially in Maharashtra with CET and limited seats. What was your decision-making process like when you finally said, “Yes, I’m going to law school”?
Very soon, I realised that the seats are extremely limited and the number of applicants is very high. But my determination was stronger than the competition. I was firmly committed to entering this field and serving Nyaydevta (न्यायदेवता). That conviction pushed me to start preparing for the Maharashtra CET in every way I could.
I collected different books, watched numerous educational videos, and gathered as much knowledge as possible about the exam. Of course, there was a lot of stress at that time knowing that thousands apply but only a few get selected. But I kept reminding myself that if I want to make a place in this country, if I want to fulfil my dreams and my family’s expectations, then I must fight for it with full dedication.
With that mindset, I decided to face the CET confidently. I studied sincerely, worked consistently, and eventually scored very good marks. I secured the college I had hoped for, and that was the moment my real journey into the field of law truly began.
How did Government Law College, Churchgate come into the picture? What convinced you that this was the right place for you?
While researching colleges, Government Law College, Churchgate immediately stood out. The more I read, the more I realised that GLC is not just a law college it is an institution that has shaped India’s legal and democratic history. Its alumni include towering personalities like Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, Lokmanya Tilak, India’s first Chief Justice Harilal Kania, Justice Bhushan Gavai, Nani Palkhivala, Justice P.N. Bhagwati, former President Pratibha Tai Patil, leaders like L.K. Advani and Piyush Goyal, and countless judges, scholars and advocates who have contributed to the nation.
When a single institution consistently produces such legends, it means there is something very special about its environment the academic culture, the debates, the exposure, the peer group, the legacy. I felt that if I wanted to grow intellectually, challenge myself, and make my own place in the legal profession, I needed to be in a space where the finest minds once sat in the same classrooms and walked through the same corridors.
That’s what convinced me that Government Law College was the right place for me. For me, GLC is not just a college; it is a mandir of Saraswati, a place where knowledge, discipline and legacy come together. I wanted to be part of that heritage, and I believed that studying there would give me the foundation, confidence and exposure needed to become the kind of lawyer I aspire to be.
Do you remember the day you first walked into GLC the building near Churchgate, the chaos, the energy? What stayed with you from that first week?
What struck me immediately was the uniqueness of the environment. Students in crisp formals moving with purpose, seniors preparing for moot court rounds, committee members organising events, classrooms buzzing with discussions, and the constant movement of people who are genuinely serious about the law. There was discipline, seriousness and ambition in the air the kind of environment that makes you want to improve yourself.
In that first week, I realised something very important: a college is not defined by its walls or its building, but by the people who bring it to life. At GLC, the principal, the professors, the alumni network and the students together create an ecosystem that constantly pushes you to grow. Everyone I met was putting in effort whether it was teaching, mentoring or learning and that energy stayed with me.
Even today, whenever I think of my first week, I remember that feeling of becoming part of a living legacy, and it continues to motivate me every single day.
Coming from a non law background (B.A.), how did you experience the shift in academic style from more descriptive subjects to the rigour of case law, statutes and interpretation?
When I came into law, the style changed, but the habit of deep study helped me. Instead of reading about ideas, I now had to read statutes, apply interpretation, and understand real-life situations through case law. Earlier, I was learning what society thinks. In law, I began learning how society actually functions through legal principles.
Yes, the rigour increased you have to remember sections, understand legal language, interpret judgments, and think logically. But I had already accepted that entering the legal profession means committing to lifelong learning. So I embraced it with a positive mindset.
Both fields are descriptive and require hard work, but law gave a new sharpness to my thinking. It taught me discipline, clarity and the ability to analyse issues from multiple angles. So instead of feeling the shift as a burden, I felt it as a natural step towards the career I had chosen.
If you had to describe GLC’s culture in three words, what would they be and why those three?
Discipline, because from the very first day, GLC teaches you how to function in a professional legal environment. Whether it is attending lectures, preparing for moots, interning alongside studies, or simply observing seniors and professors, the college instills a sense of structure that stays with you throughout your legal career.
Aspiration, because every corner of GLC carries the dreams of thousands of students who enter with the hope of becoming skilled lawyers, judges, academics, or policymakers. You constantly see people preparing for competitions, Civil Services, Judiciary exams, and internships reminding you that ambition is the heartbeat of this place.
Identity, because GLC is not just a building; it shapes who you become. It gives you confidence, perspective, and a connection to a legacy built by generations of lawyers who walked the same corridors. It becomes a part of your personalitysomething you carry with pride long after you leave.
These three words together capture why GLC is more than a law college it is a formative experience that shapes both your professional journey and your sense of self.
Walk me through a typical day for you right now from the time you step out of your house to the time you go to bed. Where does law school really ‘happen’ for you: classroom, library, canteen, court corridors, internships?
When I step out of my house, the day usually begins with classes, because both in Pune and now in Mumbai, the classroom has been the starting point of understanding core subjects and building conceptual discipline. After class hours, most of my learning shifts to court corridors and internship offices, where the real texture of law becomes visible how cases move, how clients speak, how seniors strategise, and how written law turns into practical action. These hours give me the confidence that I am growing into the profession with every passing day.
Once I return home, the evening is dedicated to reading, revising, and preparing
whether it is case law, class notes, internship work, or upcoming submissions. And when exam season arrives, the centre of gravity naturally shifts back to the college environment, because that is where focused preparation, doubt-clearing, and academic consolidation happen most effectively.
From morning to night, my day is a combination of movement, observation, discipline, and continuous learning. Law school happens for me in all these spaces together classrooms that build foundation, courts and internships that give direction, and my study table that ties everything into real understanding.
Which subjects have surprised you either because you loved them unexpectedly or struggled with them more than you imagined?
I won’t say I ever “struggled” with a subject. Rather, I’ve learned that law becomes difficult only when we neglect it. The moment we give time, consistency, and curiosity, even the toughest topics start opening up. So the surprise for me was this: the more effort I put in, the more the subject gives back and that is one thing I have come to respect deeply in my legal studies.
Is there a teacher or visiting faculty at GLC who has changed the way you look at law or at your own career possibilities? What did they do differently?
What truly sets him apart is the way he speaks about the profession—with honesty, respect and a deep sense of responsibility. Listening to him made me realise that law is not just an academic pursuit but a lifelong commitment to learning, service and integrity. His guidance has strengthened my confidence that I belong in litigation and that with hard work, patience and sincerity, I can build a meaningful career
Have you been involved in moots, debates, committees or college activities? How have those experiences shaped your confidence and your sense of “lawyerly” skills like argumentation and public speaking?
I have also anchored college events, including Marathi Day, where I received a lot of appreciation. Those moments strengthened my stage presence, my connection with audiences, and my comfort in expressing myself publicly. Altogether, these activities have shaped my courtroom confidence, improved my advocacy skills, and helped me recognise that being a lawyer is not only about knowing the law, but also about communicating it with conviction and clarity.
What has been your relationship with the library especially in a college like GLC with its history and collection? Any memory of discovering an old commentary or judgment that made you feel part of a longer tradition?
Yet, even with this approach, the library has still played an important role in my journey. Every time I walk through those shelves filled with old commentaries, bare acts, and decades-old judgments, I feel the weight of the legal tradition I’m stepping into. Taking a borrowed book knowing how many earlier students and lawyers must have read the same pages gives a sense of continuity, as if I’m becoming part of that long line of learners and advocates who shaped themselves through the same texts.
You’ve interned at the Chambers of Adv. Akshay Deshmukh and with firms/organisations like NyayaSarthak and I.V. Merchant & Co. What was the first time you walked into a court or office as an ‘intern’ like?
By the time I joined the Chambers of Adv. Akshay Deshmukh, I was ready for deeper exposure and that is exactly what I got. I witnessed real criminal and civil practice, consumer matters, and even appeared before the Consumer Forum with an authority letter. It was the first time I felt the true weight of responsibility, and it pushed me to learn faster, work harder, and become more observant. Later, during my internship at the Buldhana District Court with Adv. Shrived Ingle, I got to see grassroots litigation closely the drafting, client interactions, and court procedures in their raw, practical form. Each internship, in its own way, strengthened my foundation and made me more certain that internships are not just an “add-on” in legal education they are the place where classroom knowledge meets real law, and where a student begins turning into a lawyer.
At the Chambers of Adv. Akshay Deshmukh, what kind of work did you get to do research, drafting, court visits, client interaction? How did that change your understanding of what litigation actually is?
This internship completely transformed my understanding of litigation.
Before this, litigation felt like an abstract idea arguments, judgments, and bare acts. But working in this chamber taught me that litigation is actually a combination of discipline, attention to detail, real-time decision-making, and constant learning. Watching my senior handle criminal and civil matters showed me how law operates beyond textbooks: the pressure, the responsibility, the human stories, and the satisfaction of presenting a case effectively. It made me realise that litigation is not just a profession it’s a demanding craft, one that requires patience, clarity of thought, and the ability to stay steady even in unpredictable situations. And it confirmed for me that I am on the right path.
Was there a moment during any internship when you thought, “This is nothing like what we read in textbooks”? What was that gap between theory and practice?
What struck me most was that real cases never arrive in “perfect” formats like in classroom examples. Facts are messy, clients are confused, documents are incomplete, and situations demand quick judgement. Theory may teach us what the law is, but practice teaches us how the law actually lives in the system. That moment showed me that being a lawyer is not just about remembering provisions, it is about using them with confidence, clarity and presence of mind in real, unpredictable situations.
Each workplace has its own style. How were NyayaSarthak and I.V. Merchant & Co. different from a personal chamber practice in culture, hierarchy, and the kind of matters you saw?
I.V. Merchant & Co., on the other hand, had the pace and intensity of a Mumbai firm. The matters were very different IBC work, property disputes, insolvency cases—and the workflow was faster, more commercial, and more interconnected with finance and documentation. The environment was more formal, more demanding, and I constantly felt the need to keep up with the associates. That pressure actually pushed me to grow and to understand how large-scale matters move through a system.
A personal chamber practice, like the Chambers of Adv. Akshay Deshmukh, was an entirely different universe. Here, the work was hands-on, close-knit, and directly connected to clients and courtrooms. I dealt with criminal matters, civil issues, consumer disputes, attended court daily, and even appeared with an authority letter. It felt real, immediate, and human. There was no gap between the file in your hand and the person who needed help. The hierarchy was flatter, the learning was faster, and the responsibility felt personal.
These three spaces drafting, firm culture, and chamber practice together showed me the full spectrum of litigation: from the quiet room where a petition begins to the courtroom where someone’s future is argued.
What’s one assignment or matter from any internship that you still remember clearly either because it was very challenging, or because it was the first time you felt like a ‘real’ lawyer?
The relief and gratitude she expressed after our discussion left a lasting impression on me. In that moment, I truly felt the weight and responsibility of being a lawyer the ability to use legal knowledge not just as a set of rules, but as a tool to provide clarity, hope, and support to someone in need. It was the first time I genuinely experienced what it means to be a ‘real’ lawyer: someone whose guidance can bring immediate impact and meaningful change in a person’s life. That encounter strengthened my resolve to approach the legal profession with empathy, diligence, and an unwavering commitment to justice.
You’ve studied in Pune and now in Mumbai. How has shifting between these cities shaped you not just professionally, but personally?
Coming to Mumbai added a new dimension to this experience. Here, the pace is faster, the competition is intense, and people never stop working hard. The city taught me resilience, adaptability, and the importance of balancing ambition with practical action. Professionally, it exposed me to a more diverse and dynamic environment, sharpening my skills and broadening my perspective. Personally, moving between these two cities helped me grow in confidence, independence, and the ability to navigate different cultures and mindsets, all of which are invaluable for a career in law.
Law in Maharashtra often moves between Marathi, Hindi and English in courts, in client meetings, in everyday life. How have you navigated language in your legal journey so far?
I also have a deep respect for every language because I believe that language is one of the greatest sources of knowledge, understanding, and cultural heritage. Language shapes thought, conveys nuances, and builds bridges between people, which is particularly important in law, where clarity and comprehension are critical. Being multilingual has strengthened my communication skills, helped me appreciate multiple perspectives, understand social contexts better, and approach legal issues with sensitivity, precision, and empathy.
What have local trains, commutes and the physical experience of Mumbai taught you about people and conflicts the very things law is supposed to address?
These experiences have reinforced my understanding of law as a tool to manage such conflicts and protect rights. It has shown me the importance of empathy, fairness, and reasoned intervention. Seeing people navigate struggles daily has strengthened my determination to serve as an advocate for nyaydevta, ensuring justice reaches those who need it, and helping society function even in chaotic circumstances.
If Pune and Mumbai were clients, how would you describe each one in a short “brief” to the court?
If Mumbai were my client, I would brief the court that Mumbai is high-energy, ambitious, and opportunistic. It thrives in complex situations, adapts quickly to changing circumstances, and expects swift, practical solutions. Mumbai demands creativity, bold strategies, and resilience, and trusts counsel who can navigate unpredictability while achieving tangible results.
And if the cities could speak themselves, Pune would say, “I taught you patience, planning, and discipline,” while Mumbai would say, “I challenged you to adapt, innovate, and push your limits.” Both have guided me, inspired me, and shaped my journey in ways only they could.
Right now, how clear is your sense of direction: do you see yourself as a future litigator, a corporate lawyer, a policy person, or are you still in exploration mode?
I see litigation not just as a career, but as a platform to make a tangible difference. It allows me to uphold justice, give a voice to those who may feel powerless, and contribute meaningfully to society. I am fully aware that this path requires continuous hard work, patience, and persistence, and I am prepared to invest in all of these. At the same time, I recognize that financial stability is important, and I aim to grow in this profession both in terms of expertise and in being adequately rewarded for my dedication, ensuring that I can continue to serve justice responsibly and sustainably.
What attracts you to litigation (if it does) the drama of court, the intellectual challenge, the idea of fighting for someone who has no voice, something else?
At the same time, litigation offers a rare mix of intellectual challenge and human impact. Every matter demands deep thinking, strategy and understanding, but beyond the technical side, it also gives the opportunity to stand for someone who may otherwise have no voice. It is a space where genuine effort can bring real change.
More than the drama of the courtroom, what inspires me is the belief that this profession, when used ethically and sincerely, can create meaningful and lasting impact. Litigation allows a lawyer not just to argue cases, but to strengthen faith in justice, one matter at a time and that is what truly draws me toward it.
How do you think about success in the legal profession is it designations, types of matters, income, impact, something more personal?
At the same time, I also believe that money is necessary. Not as the main measure of success, but as something important for stability, dignity and the ability to grow as an independent advocate. Financial comfort gives strength, but it should follow hard work and integrity, not become the purpose of the profession.
Designations, types of matters, or income may come with time, but to me these are secondary. The real achievement is staying committed to truth, improving every day, and ensuring that the people who place their faith in the justice system are not disappointed. If I can do that, then I will consider myself successful
The legal market is changing technology, AI, online filings, virtual hearings. As someone entering the profession now, what excites you and what worries you about this new landscape?
At the same time, what worries me is that excessive dependence on technology might dilute the human essence of the profession. Law is not just data; it is emotion, persuasion, ethics and lived experience. I fear that many young entrants may rely on shortcuts, ignoring the fundamental discipline of reading, observing courtrooms and learning from seniors things I personally value a lot. I want to grow through real struggle, real drafting, real arguments. So my hope is to use technology as a tool, not a crutch. If I can maintain that balance, then this new landscape becomes not a challenge, but an opportunity to become a strong and thoughtful advocate.
If you could design your “ideal” first five years after law school no constraints what would they look like, year by year?
As the years progress, I would hope to argue smaller matters independently, earn the trust of seniors and clients, and gradually build my own confidence and reputation. By the fifth year, I see myself earning steadily, handling matters with maturity, and standing on the threshold of becoming an independent advocate , someone who is still learning every day, but strong, capable, and firmly rooted in the profession. This mix of struggle, growth, exposure, and evolving responsibility is what an “ideal” early journey in law looks like to me.
If a first year student at GLC or any law college in Maharashtra came to you and said, “I’m overwhelmed where do I start?”, what three concrete things would you tell them to do in the next six months?
1. Start with Direction
Spend some time understanding what areas of law interest you litigation, corporate, criminal, etc. You don’t need to decide immediately, but start observing, reading, and speaking to seniors so you gain clarity.
2. Balance Study and Internships
Read your bare acts regularly and build strong study discipline, but also take short internships. Both classroom learning and practical exposure are equally important in the first year.
3. Begin with Basic, Ground-Level Internships
If you’re aiming for litigation, start with a small local court or a nearby advocate. Learn filing, drafting, court procedure, and day-to-day practice. Don’t run behind big courts in the first year it may overwhelm you and drain your money unnecessarily.
And I would end by telling them: “Trust your journey. Stay sincere to knowledge and stay devoted to Nyaydevta this profession rewards patience, discipline, and honesty.”