In which case, where the advocate of one of the parties was asking for continuous adjournments to the immense inconvenience of the opposite party, it was held by the Supreme Court that seeking adjournments for postponing the examination of witnesses who were present without making other arrangements for examining such witnesses is a dereliction of the duty that an advocate owed to the Court amounting to misconduct.
AIBE VIII 2015 Set A Question 27
Read this AIBE previous year question with options and the official answer-key label, or start the timed PYQ practice for the full paper.
LegalAlphabet is not the official AIBE portal and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Bar Council of India or AIBE. Use the official AIBE portal for notices, admit cards, results, and final instructions.