AIBE XIII 2018 Set D Question 87

Read this AIBE previous year question with options and the official answer-key label, or start the timed PYQ practice for the full paper.

LegalAlphabet is not the official AIBE portal and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Bar Council of India or AIBE. Use the official AIBE portal for notices, admit cards, results, and final instructions.

Start timed practice All AIBE papers

Question 87 of 100 AIBE XIII 2018 Set D

'The doctrine of Lis pendens' was explained in the leading case of:

A Bellamy Vs Sabine Official answer
B Cooper Vs Cooper
C Streatifised Vs Streafield
D Tulk Vs Moxbay