Skip to main content
AIBE question and official answer

AIBE V 2013 Set A Question 21

Read this AIBE previous year question with options and the official answer-key label, or start the timed PYQ practice for the full paper.

LegalAlphabet is not the official AIBE portal and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Bar Council of India or AIBE. Use the official AIBE portal for notices, admit cards, results, and final instructions.

Question 21 of 100 AIBE V 2013 Set A

"The DNA test cannot rebut the conclusive presumption envisaged under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act. The parties can avoid the rigor of such conclusive presumption only by proving non-access which is a negative proof." It was so held in which case

  1. A Shaik Fakruddin vs. Shaik Mohammed Hasan, AIR 2006 AP 48 Official answer
  2. B Siddaramesh vs. State of Karnataka (2010) 3 SCC 152
  3. C Kailash vs. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 2007 SC 107
  4. D Somwanti vs. State of Punjab. AIR 1963 SC 151

We use cookies to improve your experience and show relevant ads. You can accept or decline non-essential cookies. See our Cookie Policy.