AIBE question and official answer

AIBE V 2013 Set A Question 37

Read this AIBE previous year question with options and the official answer-key label, or start the timed PYQ practice for the full paper.

LegalAlphabet is not the official AIBE portal and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Bar Council of India or AIBE. Use the official AIBE portal for notices, admit cards, results, and final instructions.

Question 37 of 100 AIBE V 2013 Set A

"Provisions of Section 195 of the Code are mandatory and non-compliance of it would vitiate the prosecution and all other consequential orders." In which case the Court upheld so

  1. A C. Muniappan vs. State of Tamilnadu Official answer
  2. B Kishun Singh vs. State of Bihar
  3. C State of Karnataka vs. Pastor P. Raju.
  4. D None of the above.

We use cookies to improve your experience and show relevant ads. You can accept or decline non-essential cookies. See our Cookie Policy.